In 2011 a property owner wanted to change his zoning from 3.3 acres to one acre lots off Camino DeManna. ( by the cell tower) Ranco De Manna. The town made them jump through hoops. They questioned them at length at the public hearing.
This month the town passes two zoning changes to cluster homes on 6000 SF lots with no discussion. How is that possible for such a major change with total opposition from the adjacent property owners? It makes no sense unless the it was a done deal before the public hearing.. for that to happen there would have to be private discussions with the developers and between councilors prior to the public hearing.....
And it did happen in the last two passed proposals.. they circumvented the pubic notice law by meeting with no more than two in the room with the developer at a time before the public hearing. So there was no discussion, no questions before the public that night.
This is just short of criminal behavior by the council..... it defeats the public hearing process. We the people needed to hear the questions and deals made with the developers to pass the zoning change that made millions for two developers at the detriment of the surrounding property owners.
During the zoning change for the Rancho De Manna they questioned the owner at length and made them make concessions in public. For these two they did not ... Why?
Then there is the publishing of the minutes, the minutes of the cell tower Rancho De Manna public hearing were in detail and explicit.
http://www.marana.com/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/3403
and then there is this meeting for two major zoning changes;
http://www.marana.com/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/4290
People spoke passionately against the two zoning changes and for their full time allotted and this is all that is reported. It is also not mentioned that they denied several of us the use of the overhead projector. They even have a written policy for the public to use it but they said we could not.. The planners and developers could do anything they wanted with the projector and computers.
http://www.marana.com/DocumentCenter/Home/View/4560
Declaring a conflict of interest, Marana Mayor Ed Honea removed himself from the council
dais on Tuesday night when it came to discussions over emergency sewage connections in t
he Honea Heights neighborhood, of which he is the landowner.
But even after his declaration, conflict did arise when Honea requested to speak on the subject
as a citizen of the town.
It was then, as Honea began to approach the podium, that resident David Morales – a former
council candidate and regular at town meetings – stood from his chair and interrupted Honea,
calling for a point of order.
Approaching the dais, Morales stated that allowing Honea to speak on the subject – whether as
a citizen or not – was in itself a conflict of interest.
Vice Mayor Jon Post, who was leading the meeting in Honea’s temporary absence, deferred
to Town Attorney Frank Cassidy.
“Even though I would recommend, typically, that any councilmember not attempt to speak as
a private citizen… from a First Amendment perspective, he has a right if he insists on doing it,”
said Cassidy. “I do think it creates an appearance of conflict, because a councilmember has
more sway with fellow council members. There’s no question about that. I’ll leave it at that –
I don’t think we can demand Mr. Honea not speak.”
The item before council on Tuesday was intended to examine policy guidelines for the use of
town funds to pay for emergency sewage connections fees and related construction for
residents of Honea Heights, a low-to-medium income neighborhood whose residents, in part,
are hooked to septic.
Some of those residents are experiencing failing septic systems.
In 2004, a partnership was formed between Marana and Pima County to convert all plots from
septic to sewage, but due to contracting bankruptcies, insufficient funding, and later, the battle
over wastewater control between the two jurisdictions, the project was left unfinished.
Now, with the town owning and operating its own sewer system, the burden has fallen entirely
on Marana to – as residents in Tuesday’s meeting stated – “keep its promise” in completing the
project.
Town Manager Gilbert Davidson says the town has been working on doing exactly that since the
project came to a halt, having invested approximately $4 million in town funds and grants to
rectify failing septic systems and area infrastructure.
Even with that amount invested, funding was exhausted before all Honea Heights homes could
be hooked up to sewage.
There are an estimated 96 property owners that are not hooked into the sewage system.
Approximately 350 people live in the neighborhood’s 199 units.
The town intends to continue pursuing grant money to help offset the cost of hookups and
construction expenses, but is also budgeting $75,000 for at least the next two years in the
case emergency septic issues arise.
But the issue before council on Tuesday night was less about whether the town should pay
for emergency hookups than it was about who should receive those hookups.
Councilmember Roxanne Ziegler argued that only owner-occupied properties should qualify
and that the property owner of the rental homes – in this case Honea – should be held
responsible for paying for those sewage hookups since he has been collecting rent money.
The town estimates each sewage hookup and construction will cost an average of $12,000.
If council determined rental properties did not qualify for emergency hookups, Honea would
have to come out of pocket for each of his rentals’ fees.
It was on that subject that Honea chose to speak, albeit briefly.
“In the early days of this promise, there was no differential between owner occupied or
rental properties,” said Honea.
Honea said he charges renters just $165 per month.
“If you charge me $12,000 because it’s a rental property for those units, to hook them up,
I will shut it down, and make those people homeless,” said Honea. “It’s not a threat, it’s a business decision on my part. I can’t pay $12,000 for every one of those units to hook them up. The hookup fee for the sewer is worth more than the property.”
Those words were enough to prompt a quick response from Ziegler.
“Mr. Honea. First of all I can’t believe you would actually evict those people. Shame on you,”
she said, adding it wasn't fair to “hold the council hostage” for what she said should be his
financial responsibility.
Shortly after, Ziegler made a motion that only owner-occupied households, whether considered
low-income or not, qualify for town-funded emergency sewage connection fees.
The motion failed in a 3-3 vote.
Referencing the fact that future grant money received would apply equally to owners and renters,
councilmember Dave Bowen put forward a second motion that construction and connection fees
would be paid for all currently occupied homes that are considered habitable.
However, there are no guarantees the grant money referred to by Bowen will be approved.
The town has only applied for the funding at this point.
The motion passed unanimously.
Future renters and homeowners of Honea Heights are not subject to the privileges of
town-funded emergency hookups t
So wht does he do next??
http://explorernews.com/news/article_3c2d870a-e8ec-11e2-9367-0019bb2963f4.html
So wht does he do next??
http://explorernews.com/news/article_3c2d870a-e8ec-11e2-9367-0019bb2963f4.html